We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 December 14
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION ALMOST FLAT AT -0.2%
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Monday, 29 December 14
CHINESE COAL IMPORTS: REGULATORY RISKS? - CLARKSONS
In recent years, Chinese seaborne coal imports have surged, registering average growth of 67% p.a. between 2009 and 2013 to total 265mt. However, t ...
Monday, 29 December 14
BULK MARKET ENDS YEAR ON SOUR NOTE, SHIPBROKER SEES 'BUMPY ROAD AHEAD' - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
2014 was supposed to be the year that the dry bulk market would stage a comeback and a sustainable one for that matter. However, while for the most ...
Monday, 29 December 14
Q1'15 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AT $59.42
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery has decreased by US$ 3.51 (-5.58%) month over month and US$ 0.08 (-0.13%) ...
Monday, 29 December 14
SGX'S FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS IMPROVED W-O-W, LOST M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 1.44 per MT (-2.73%) month over month and gained US$ 0.36 (+0.71%) ...
|
|
|
Showing 3286 to 3290 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
|
| |
| |
|
