We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 19 December 14
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION REACHED APPROXIMATELY 19.8 MMST; UP 1.0% WOW
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 19.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Friday, 19 December 14
HANDY: SOFTER TONE; PANAMAX: QUIET WEEK; CAPESIZE; PAINFUL WEEK
Handy
A softer tone for rates and volumes for the Supras, perhaps less apparent in the Pacific the last week before the season holidays and good ...
Thursday, 18 December 14
INDONESIA TO REVISE UP COAL OUTPUT TARGET TO 460 MILLION TONS IN 2015
COALspot.com: Indonesian government has revised up its next year coal output forecast to 460 million tons from its previous forecast of 421 million ...
Wednesday, 17 December 14
CAPES RATES SLIPPED BELOW $5,600/DAY, FELL 84% YOY
COALspot.com: In the very rare occurrence when the BCI stands below the BDI, words to describe market sentiment are probably poor, said Intermodal ...
Wednesday, 17 December 14
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL SHANGHAI, SNP TEAM
As the end of the fourth quarter is approaching, we are all witness to the second hand market prices softening day by day. Any new deal surfacing t ...
|
|
|
Showing 3301 to 3305 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
