We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 January 15
FIVE ENERGY SURPRISES FOR 2015: THE POSSIBLE AND THE IMPROBABLE - KURT COBB
The coming year is likely to be as full of surprises in the field of energy as 2014 was. We just don't know which surprises! I am not predictin ...
Monday, 05 January 15
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2014 AND LOOKING FORWARD - BIMCO
2014 started with plenty of optimism for a considerably better global economy and an improved shipping market. Things turned out somewhat different ...
Monday, 05 January 15
API 5 FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1'15 DELIVERY CLOSED US$ 0.45 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2'15 CLOSING
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery lost US$ 0.60 per MT (-1.15%) month over month and gained US$ 0.02 (+0.04%) ...
Sunday, 04 January 15
BALTIC DRY INDEX CONTINUES ITS DECLINE IN 2015
Wish you all a very Happy New Year 2015. The last report was dated 19th Dec 2014 and due to Christmas and new year holidays no reports were publish ...
Saturday, 03 January 15
U.S WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION FELL 11.2% TO 17.6 MMST WEEK OVER WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
|
|
|
Showing 3276 to 3280 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|
