We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 11 January 15
BDI DECLINED 8% ON WEEK; BCI LOST 31%
COALspot.com: The BDI continued its decline in the first week of this year or lost 8 pct week over week. The BDI was closed at 709 points whi ...
Friday, 09 January 15
U.S. EASTERN SPOT STEAM COAL PRICES FELL IN 2014; ROSE IN WEST - EIA
U.S. Eastern spot steam coal prices declined in 2014 compared to 2013 levels because of a decline in steam coal exports.
According to U.S. Ene ...
Friday, 09 January 15
WEEKLY U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP AN ESTIMATED 2.2% Y-O-Y
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 17.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 08 January 15
INDONESIA PRESSES ON WITH HIGHER COAL ROYALTY FEE TO BOOST STATE REVENUE - JG
The Indonesian government is pressing on with its plan to raise the royalty charged to coal miners in order to increase state revenue, but the move ...
Wednesday, 07 January 15
FUEL EFFICIENT SHIPS MAKE LESS SENSE IN LOWER BUNKER PRICE MARKET, BUT FUEL COSTS ARE BOUND TO RISE AGAIN
The shipping industry entered 2015 on mixed emotions, as a relatively buoyant tanker market is met by a rather lackluster dry bulk market. Still, a ...
|
|
|
Showing 3266 to 3270 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Planning Commission, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
