We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q2 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP DECLINED 8.66% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q1’ 2015 delivery declined by US$ 3.48 (-5.73%) month over month and US$ 2.35 (-3.94%) week ...
Tuesday, 13 January 15
Q1' 2015 RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN Q2 & Q4 2015 SWAPS
COALspot.com: API 4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q1' 2015 lost month on month and week over week.
The Q1 swap has lost US$ 7.21 ...
Monday, 12 January 15
COAL: LOW PRICES ARE EXPECTED TO DRIVE A SUPPLY-DRIVEN RECOVERY IN THE MEDIUM TERM - SGX
COALspot.com: Thermal coal prices dropped to six-year lows in 2014 driven by persistent oversupply, SGX says in its “ Commodities 2014 - A ye ...
Monday, 12 January 15
FREIGHT MARKET: 2015 FLEET SUPPLY GROWTH IS EXPECTED TO REMAIN SLIGHTLY AHEAD OF CARGO GROWTH - SGX
COALspot.com: The dry bulk freight market was forced to digest a number of negatives in 2014 leading the Baltic Dry Index to fall 66% through the y ...
Monday, 12 January 15
SHIPPING - CHALLENGES AND RESOLUTIONS - EVA TZIMA
Last year has without a doubt been another challenging one both for both our industry and our country. As Greece is currently dominated by election ...
|
|
|
Showing 3261 to 3265 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
|
| |
| |
|
