We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total loss (“CTL”), whether the claimants had lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, and whether the claimants were entitled to an indemnity for salvage, tug hire and port expenses under a war risks policy.
Background
The first claimant was the owner of the tanker Brillante Virtuoso (the “vessel”). The vessel was insured against war risks under a policy underwritten by the defendants. The second claimant was the mortgagee of the vessel and the co-assured under the policy. The value of the vessel under the hull and machinery section of the policy was US$55 million, and a further US$22 million under the increased value section of the policy.
In July 2011, whilst en route from the Ukraine to China, the vessel (carrying a cargo of fuel oil) stopped off in Aden in order for an unarmed security team to embark ahead of their journey through the Gulf of Aden and the Indian Ocean where there is a risk of pirate attacks. However, whilst the vessel was waiting, it was in fact boarded by armed pirates who detonated an explosive device causing a fire on board and destroying a substantial proportion of machinery and equipment. The vessel subsequently became a dead ship with no power.
The crew were rescued by the US navy and the owners engaged a salvage company the same day to extinguish the fire. The owners’ consultant surveyor inspected the ship and sought quotations from shipyards in the Middle East and China for the cleaning and repairs of the vessel. He formed the opinion that the cost of repair would exceed the insured value of US$55 million. Accordingly, the owners tendered a notice of abandonment (“NOA”) to the insurers declaring the vessel a CTL. The insurers rejected the NOA.
The owners instructed shipbrokers to sell the vessel to a suitable buyer for scrap, however, the shipbrokers struggled to find a purchaser, and only managed to secure an offer of US$700,000 for the vessel. The insurers did not object to the sale at the time (in spite of being given an opportunity to do so) and the vessel was subsequently sold.
The claimants’ case was that the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of an insured peril or perils (i.e. the acts of pirates and/or persons acting maliciously, alternatively terrorists and/or persons acting from a political motive and/or the vessel suffered loss and damage by reason of piracy, vandalism, sabotage, violent theft and/or malicious mischief).
The claimants claimed an indemnity for:
(i) a CTL;
(ii) if the vessel was not a CTL for partial loss and loss of hire and
(iii) sue and labour expenses incurred.
The insurers’ defence was that the claimants were not entitled to cover under the policy because, by delaying transit through the Gulf of Aden and/or calling at a port or place within the Gulf, the owners were in breach of the Talbot Gulf of Aden warranty which prevented vessels calling at any port or place or delaying their passage when transiting and/or the owners were in breach of the warranty by failing to apply Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy. The claimants denied this allegation.
Issues examined by the Court
Was the vessel a Constructive Total Loss?
The Court analysed the law on CTL and, in particular, examined section 60(2)(ii) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 which states that a vessel is a CTL “where she is so damaged by a peril insured against that the cost of repairing the damage would exceed the value of the ship when repaired.” Clause 19 of the Institute Time Clauses-Hulls also qualifies this further by stating:
“The measure of indemnity in respect of claims for unrepaired damage shall be the reasonable depreciation in the market value of the Vessel at the time this insurance terminates arising from such unrepaired damage, but not exceeding the reasonable cost of repairs…”
The Court held that in order to succeed in establishing that the vessel was a CTL, the claimants had to prove that the cost of repairing the vessel would have exceeded the insured value of US$55 million.
The Court held that in assessing the costs of repair to the vessel, the question to be asked is what a prudent uninsured shipowner in the position of the claimants would have done in deciding whether or not to repair the vessel, and where and how the repair should be carried out.
The Court acknowledged that in this case, it was not possible to determine with complete accuracy the actual extent of damage to the vessel. In cases such as this, where matters cannot be determined with precision, the Court has to apply a “large margin” to any repair estimate. The Court recognised that a margin of error has to be applied in relation to the extent of the damage where it was not possible to investigate fully and the assessment of the cost of repair has to take account of the fact that the items which were not opened up and tested might well have required replacement, so that a prudent uninsured owner would have replaced them.
Where should the repairs have been carried out?
The Court also held that whilst cost is an important factor in determining where the prudent uninsured owner would have carried out the repairs, it is not determinative. Accordingly, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would consider all the other factors which might well make the closer (whilst more expensive) yard the proper and appropriate place for repair. Hence, the Court considered that the prudent uninsured owner would have favoured repair in these circumstances in Dubai rather than China, even though the quotations for repairs in China were much lower than in the Middle East. Accordingly, the Court found that the vessel was a CTL.
Had the owners lost the right to claim for CTL by selling the vessel?
The Court held that the owners had not lost the right to claim for a CTL by selling the vessel, as the insurers were well aware throughout that the owners were proposing to sell the vessel and did not object to it. By selling the vessel, the owners were acting in the interests of both themselves and the insurers.
Sue and labour costs
In considering whether an indemnity was payable to the claimants for expenditure in relation to the costs of salvage, tugs and agency fees, the Court disagreed with the insurers’ case that once the vessel had been redelivered by the salvors, any insured peril which had been operating (e.g. violent theft, piracy, vandalism, sabotage and malicious mischief) ceased to operate. The Court found that until the vessel was in a place of safety, the insured peril continued to operate, even after redelivery by the salvors. The Court also held that the cost of the standby tugs and the associated agency expenses were incurred not only for the benefit of the owners, but for the benefit of the insurers, so that they were recoverable as sue and labour expenses.
However, the Court agreed with the insurers that the entitlement to recover sue and labour expenses ceased once the claim form was issued. The Court applied the decision in Kuwait Airways v Kuwait Insurance2 that the issue of the claim form (or writ) crystallises the rights and obligations of the parties to the contract of insurance, so that the relations between the parties are thereafter governed by the Civil Procedure Rules, rather than the contract of insurance. Hence the duty of utmost good faith ceases once proceedings are issued and sue and labour expenses incurred in that period are not recoverable as they were incurred solely for the owner’s benefit.
Source: Taylor Wessing Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 18 January 15
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN WEAK NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The BDI was up 4.51 pct week on week on Friday 16, January 2015. The BDI closed at 741 points on this Friday after gaining arou ...
Friday, 16 January 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP 7.3% W-O-W
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 18.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Thursday, 15 January 15
PANAMAX : MARKET CONTINUE ON LOW PACE - FEARNLEYS
Handy
On a general basis we can say that rates are softening in both hemispheres. Although for some specific trades we can see premiums being ach ...
Thursday, 15 January 15
LOW CASH COSTS, GOOD LIQUIDITY HELP ASIAN OIL COMPANIES IN PRICE ROUT - FITCH
Fitch Ratings says that rated oil and gas production companies in Asia can comfortably operate under low oil prices for some time given their gener ...
Wednesday, 14 January 15
DRY BULK MARKET NOTED ANOTHER WEEKLY DECLINE - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry bulk market noted another weekly decline on Friday, with the performance of the Capesize market still weighing down on the re ...
|
|
|
Showing 3251 to 3255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- The University of Queensland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
