We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 10 February 14
SUPRAMAX STILL AT AROUND US$ 5K + BB 50K DELIVERY KALIMANTAN FOR A TRIP TO INDIA - CAPT. REDDY
COALspot.com: The BDI was down by 1.71 pct and closed at 1091 points week ended 7 February 2014. The BDI seemed to reach the bottom as the cape inde ...
Saturday, 08 February 14
U.S PRODUCED 84.5 MMMST OF COAL IN JANUARY; 2.05% UP MONTH ON MONTH, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 18.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Friday, 07 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET ON ' REVERSE' MODE DUE TO CHINESE HOLIDAYS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has kept its uninspiring mood throughout yet another week, with the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) hovering slightly above the 1,000-poi ...
Thursday, 06 February 14
INDONESIA'S BAN ON THE EXPORT OF RAW MINERAL ORES COMES INTO FORCE - INCE & CO
COALspot.com: On 12 January 2014, the ban on the export of unprocessed mineral ores came into effect in Indonesia. This ban enforces the Mining Law ...
Thursday, 06 February 14
THE WORLD LARGEST COAL EXPORTER SHIPPED AROUND 35.90 MMT OF COAL IN DECEMBER 2013
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world 4th largest coal producer and the Global largest multi grade coal exporter shipped around $2* billion worth ...
|
|
|
Showing 3861 to 3865 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Australian Coal Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
