We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 16 February 14
SUPRAMAX : THE FAR EAST/SE ASIA CHARTER RATES FIRMED UP
COALspot.com: The freight market had a mixed reaction this week with BDI increased by 1.37 pct and closing at 1106 points on Valentine day. The cape ...
Friday, 14 February 14
US COAL PRODUCTION STILL SLIPPING
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 17.9 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 13 February 14
PANAMAX : NOT ENOUGH REQUIREMENTS TO KEEP THE ATLANTIC MARKET FLOATING - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
After the Chinese holidays the week started on a positive note. Owners are talking higher rates but chrtrs are still somehow reluctant to mov ...
Thursday, 13 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET FACES BETTER PROSPECTS ON THE BACK OF IMPROVING DEMAND AND SUPPLY BALANCE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has started off the New Year on the "left foot", with the strong finish of 2013 proving to be unsustainable, on the ba ...
Wednesday, 12 February 14
NEW BUILDING ORDERS REACHING NEW POST-CRISIS HEIGHTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Ship owners are looking to take advantage of the last few attractive deals in the new building market, before prices start climbing to new highs and ...
|
|
|
Showing 3851 to 3855 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Coal Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
