We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 February 14
2013 WAS THE YEAR OF PRIVATE EQUITY FUNDING - TIMOS PAPADIMITRIOU
COALspot.com: People say that money makes the world go round. Well, can it be that it’s the other way around? Is it possible that money needs ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAP SHOWS STRONG GROWTH IN 2014 SECOND HALF
COALspot.com – Swaps prices slide for thermal coal loading from Indonesia, the world’s largest exporter of the fuel, according SGX.
T ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE COAL EXPORTS SLIDE AROUND 15% WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 10 February 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled ...
Tuesday, 11 February 14
SHIP OWNERS INVEST IN 447 NEWBUILDINGS AND SECOND HAND VESSELS DURING JANUARY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite a rough start to the year for the dry bulk freight market and lackluster performance from most other shipping sub-segments, ship owners have ...
Monday, 10 February 14
Q1 2015, API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP CLOSED AROUND $ 2 HIGHER THAN Q2 14 PRICE
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 delivery lost 2.61 percent month on month and closed at US$ 77.28 per mt as on Frid ...
|
|
|
Showing 3856 to 3860 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
