We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 09 April 14
DRY BULK MARKET STRUGGLED THROUGHOUT THE WEEK - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market struggled throughout the week but the poor performance across the board didn't allow for any positive reversal, pushing ...
Tuesday, 08 April 14
PORT OF NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 2.90 MMT OF POWER PLANT AND SEMI-SOFT COKING COAL IN A WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 7 April 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensla ...
Tuesday, 08 April 14
RBCT SHIPPED 53.79% MORE COAL IN MARCH 2014
COALspot.com: South Africa's Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) the single largest export coal terminal in the world, shipped 6.90 million to ...
Tuesday, 08 April 14
APRIL 2014 INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE DROPS TO LOWEST SINCE JANUARY 2010
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has revised down again the coal bench mark price by US$ 2.20 / MT to ...
Tuesday, 08 April 14
TALKING ABOUT A ONE-HORSE RACE - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
Ever since the onslaught of the financial crisis, China along with the other BRIICs, have played a pivotal role in supporting global economic gr ...
|
|
|
Showing 3761 to 3765 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The University of Queensland
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
