We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 29 April 14
Q4 SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP CLOSED US$ 1.07 HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2 DELIVERY PRICE
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q2’ 2014 gain on month and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports rele ...
Tuesday, 29 April 14
NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 3.03 MILLION TONS WEEK ON WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 28 April 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensl ...
Tuesday, 29 April 14
Q2 API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP LOST 0.29% MONTH ON MONTH
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 0.29 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.43 per mt as o ...
Monday, 28 April 14
CHINA LIKELY TO FALL SHORT OF NUCLEAR POWER TARGETS AT 175GW OF CAPACITY BY 2030 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Coal will remain dominant supply at 64% of power mix
Wood Mackenzie forecasts that China will not meet its environmentally-driven, government ...
Sunday, 27 April 14
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO BE STEADY NEXT WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market seems to have bottomed out and saw some marginal gains in all segments, said Capt. Reddy of Vistaar Shipping In ...
|
|
|
Showing 3731 to 3735 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
|
| |
| |
|
