We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 23 April 14
KOMIPO INVITES BIDS FOR LOW VOLATILE BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com : Korea Midland Power Co., Ltd. has invited bids through International open bidding for 90,000 Metric Tons (MT) of low volatile bit ...
Tuesday, 22 April 14
INDONESIAN MARCH COAL EXPORT VOLUME SURGE 9.12% TO 35.54 MMT
COALspot.com: Indonesia, one of the world's largest coal producer and the global largest multi grade coal exporter shipped around $1.9 ...
Tuesday, 22 April 14
NEWCASTLE WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS FELL 13.33% THIS PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: In the week ended 07:00 hours 21 April 2014, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensl ...
Monday, 21 April 14
Q1'15 SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAP SHOWING A POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q2’ 2014 gain on month and on week according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports rele ...
Monday, 21 April 14
Q4 2014 AND Q1 2015 COAL SWAPS CLOSED MARGINALLY HIGHER COMPARED TO Q2 PRICES
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries gained 0.87 percent month on month and closed at US$ 76.15 per mt as ...
|
|
|
Showing 3741 to 3745 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
|
| |
| |
|
