We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Tuesday, 11 March 14
HOLD HARMLESS CLAUSES ARE NOT ALWAYS MUTUAL! - ITIC
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
ITIC provides an insurance related contract review service to all of its members. As the leading professional indemnity insurer for the offshore and hydrographic sector, we are often asked to review contracts which contain a mutual hold harmless or knock for knock clause. We are usually told that the presence of this clause in a contract means the risk of a claim is either significantly reduced or even non-existent! No contract is completely risk free. However, if the clause is worded carefully, and is balanced between both contracting parties, it is good contractual risk management and can help to reduce the chance of a successful claim of negligence against you.
A mutual hold harmless indemnity regime provides that each party to the contract agrees to take responsibility for, and to indemnify the other, against injury and loss to its own personnel and property and its own ‘consequential losses’. This is intended to be effective even if the accident and related losses are caused by negligence.
The mutual hold harmless clause in the LOGIC standard form contracts, does seek to create balance. However, in many of the contracts we review, the party with the greater bargaining power will naturally seek to swing the balance back to their favour. Consequently, there are a number of pitfalls to consider. We shall provide a few of these below. This shall be viewed from an English law and a professional indemnity insurance perspective.
Insurance
First, when asked to review contracts with a mutual hold harmless clause, ITIC would suggest that your other insurers are notified. Potentially you are signing away the recovery rights of both your property and employers’ liability insurer. Therefore, you should seek authority from them before signing a contract containing a mutual hold harmless clause.
They may not be mutual
It is staggering how often we see contracts where “the consultant shall indemnify the company against any and all losses,” but there is no reciprocal benefit to the consultant. Furthermore, the clause can be more beneficial to one party, as one side may be carrying out all of the work, using only their employees and property. The clause should be read carefully to ensure there is a mutual provision.
Third party damage
The mutual hold harmless clauses seen by ITIC, although setting out the losses suffered to the property or employees of the contracting parties, will often leave the distribution of third party liabilities unclear. If, for example, you act as a hydrographic consultant on a survey vessel, you should be protected from third party claims arising from the operation of the vessel. The consultant should not be responsible for potentially multi-million dollar pollution liabilities, or collision damages to third party property. These should fall upon the party who has insurance for these liabilities, such as the vessel’s protection and indemnity or hull and machinery cover.
Gross Negligence
The hold harmless regime provides that neither party shall be liable to the other even where the loss occurred is due to the negligence of one party. However, in some cases we see the clause is amended to state this does not apply in instances of “gross” negligence. Therefore, if one of the parties is found to be grossly negligent they will not be held harmless. This might be fine if the contract was pursuant to Norwegian or US law.
Unfortunately, there is no true concept of gross negligence under English law. You should always operate under the assumption that you are negligent or you are not. Baron Rolfe, in - Wilson v Brett (1843) - stated that he “could see no difference between negligence and gross negligence; that it was the same thing, with the addition of a vituperative epithet.” In other words “gross” did not add anything to the standard negligence test. That being said, if gross negligence is included in a contract, a tribunal will attempt to interpret it. The leading decision comes from Lord Mance in - The Hellespont Ardent (1997) – in which he found that gross negligence: is “conduct so seriously negligent that the defendant should not be entitled to rely on the exemption clause.” He further added that it is “very much a matter of degree and judgment,” and, “all the circumstances must be weighed and balanced.” It should be pointed out that Lord Mance was interpreting a contract pursuant to New York law. Therefore, his words are not binding, and his interpretation on gross negligence may not be followed by subsequent tribunals.
The line between negligence and gross negligence can become blurred, and cases will turn on the facts and expert evidence. Moreover, tribunals may have differing opinions on how to apply the test against the facts, reaching differing decisions. On balance, the inclusion of gross negligence within a hold harmless clause in a contract pursuant to English law can lead to uncertainty and increased litigation costs.
Finally, it is understandable that contracting parties do not want the other to rely on a hold harmless clause, as a shield for reprehensible behaviour, beyond the ordinary test of negligence. However, as the line is blurred between that of negligence and gross negligence, a more delineated position to take, is between that of wilful default/misconduct and negligence.
Indirect damages
A further and final point we see, is how consequential or indirect losses are defined in the mutual hold harmless clause. It is usual that these losses are excluded under contract. However, the distinction between indirect and direct loss can be complicated. The famous case of Hadley v Baxendale [1854] found that direct losses were those which arise naturally from the breach of contract, and is therefore foreseeable and recoverable. Whereas, indirect losses were recoverable, but only if they were reasonably foreseeable by both parties, as a possible result of a breach, at the time of contracting.
A common misconception is that all “loss of profits” are indirect losses. This is wrong. Loss of profits can be either direct or indirect, depending on the facts of the case. The following is taken from the hold harmless clause of a contract we have reviewed recently:
“ The consultant nor the company shall be liable to the other… for any consequential indirect damage, that may be suffered by the other.”
This clause could pose problems in the event of a claim, as it only excludes “consequential indirect damages.” Following Hadley v Baxendale, dependant on the facts, loss of profit can either be a direct or indirect result of the breach. If, for example, a consultant was providing design work for sub-sea equipment and carried out the design negligently, not only could this cause damage to property, but also lost drilling time, leading to lost revenue and profit. In this example, a tribunal could find the loss of profit arose naturally from the breach, and therefore, is a direct loss not excluded under the above hold harmless clause. Taking into account the current day rates of drill rigs, this could form a substantial part of any claim.
The clause should be amended to state loss of profits are excluded, whether direct or indirect.
Conclusion
ITIC’s advice is that you carefully review your hold harmless clauses to ensure that they are actually mutual and of benefit to you.
Source: ITIC / Hellenic Shipping
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 May 14
HUANENG CLEAN ENERGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE HAS CONFIRMED TO SPEAK AT CCF2014
Press Release: Produced by CDMC Events, The 13th Clean Coal Forum 2014 will be held on June 12,13, 2014 in Beijing, China. We are glad to invite ...
Monday, 05 May 14
SUB BIT-FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS LOST GROUND LAST WEEK
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swaps for average Q3’ 2014 lost on day, week and on month according to AsiaClear OTC coal swap's reports ...
Monday, 05 May 14
API 8 CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP FOR AVERAGE Q3 14 DELIVERIES: LOST 0.82% M-O-M
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q3 14 deliveries lost 0.82 percent month on month and closed at US$ 75.20 per mt as o ...
Sunday, 04 May 14
INDONESIA TO INDIA FREIGHT RATES ARE SHOWING POSITIVE TREND
COALspot.com: The freight market is seems to be some recovery as cape index has increased by 7.84 pct week on week. Cape index closed at 1829 po ...
Friday, 02 May 14
ADARO ENERGY STARTS YEAR 2014 WELL DESPITE CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS
COALspot.com: Adaro Energy, the second largest Indonesian coal miner's revenue increased 14% to US$ 845 million due to higher sales volume, ...
|
|
|
Showing 3721 to 3725 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Planning Commission, India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
|
| |
| |
|
