We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 25 March 20
CORONAVIRUS CRISIS IS CRUSHING GLOBAL GDP GROWTH - FITCH RATINGS
The coronavirus crisis is crushing global GDP growth according to Fitch Ratings in its latest quarterly “Global Economic Outlook” (GEO) ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
There is no doubt that the Covid-19 pandemic crisis is a world-shattering event that will change the world as we know it. Societies are facing chal ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
INDONESIA TO CANCEL RULES REQUIRING DOMESTIC SHIPS FOR COAL, PALM EXPORTS : REFINITIV
Indonesia's government will revoke rules requiring exporters of coal and palm oil to use domestic shipping companies for shipments, Coordinatin ...
Wednesday, 25 March 20
JAN-FEB 2020, INDONESIA SHIPPED 64.5 MLN TONNES OF COAL, UP +3.4% YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
In the 12 months of calendar 2019, Indonesia exported 386.4 mln tonnes of coal, according to vessel tracking data from Refinitiv. This represents a ...
Tuesday, 24 March 20
MARKET ANALYSIS - ALLIED
As countries around the world struggle to take back control of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic the global economy shuts down bit by bit, leaving only ...
|
|
|
Showing 1046 to 1050 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Coal Association
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Planning Commission, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
