We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 28 March 20
ASIA'S COAL MARKETS DIVERGE ON QUALITY LINES AS CORONAVIRUS HITS INDIA - REUTERS
Asia’s seaborne coal market is increasingly diverging between higher-quality Australian coal, where prices are holding up despite the economi ...
Friday, 27 March 20
CHINA'S BULKS: THE SENTIMENT GAP BETWEEN STEEL AND COAL WIDENS - WOOD MACKENZIE
China seems to be containing its local coronavirus situation, with imported cases now posing the greater threat. While quarantine measures remain t ...
Friday, 27 March 20
S.KOREA Q1 THERMAL COAL IMPORTS SET FOR 10-YR LOW ON ANTI-POLLUTION MEASURES - REUTERS
South Korea’s first-quarter thermal coal imports are set to fall to a decade-low due to stricter air pollution measures, while the coronaviru ...
Friday, 27 March 20
PORT OF NEWCASTLE OPERATIONS CONTINUE WITH COVID-19 RESPONSE MEASURES IN PLACE
Port of Newcastle, like many organisations, is taking a precautionary approach to help manage COVID-19 risks in the community. Our focus is on ensu ...
Thursday, 26 March 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE DROPS SLIGHTLY - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price dropped slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge ...
|
|
|
Showing 1041 to 1045 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
