We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 June 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The World Bank estimates that the global economy will fall by 5.2% this year, underlining that the Covid-19 pandemic has had rapid and massive cons ...
Tuesday, 23 June 20
COVID-19 COULD CAUSE A BOOM IN COAL POWER - RYSTAD ENERGY | OILPRICE
COVID-19 has not only impacted the energy industry’s revenues but also its infrastructure development.
The delay of new natural gas ...
Tuesday, 23 June 20
CHINA'S COAL OUTPUT UP 0.9 PCT IN JANUARY-MAY: XINHUA
Output of raw coal in China rose 0.9 percent year on year to 1.47 billion tonnes in the first five months of this year, official data showed.
& ...
Monday, 22 June 20
KAMSARMAX TYPES REGULARLY HIT THE $9,000 PER DAY LEVEL FOR INDONESIAN COAL RUN TO CHINA, BALTIC BRIEFING SAYS
Capesize
The Capesize market trajectory this week has been one of the steepest rallies the sector has experienced. Opening at $12,410, the sect ...
Saturday, 20 June 20
WORLD OIL DEMAND IS PROJECTED TO DECREASE BY 9.1 MB/D IN 2020 - OPEC
Crude Oil Price Movements
Spot crude oil prices rebounded in May from low levels registered a month earlier, as physical market fundamentals im ...
|
|
|
Showing 896 to 900 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
