We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 01 July 20
COLOMBIA'S COAL EXPORT VOLUMES HAVE STEADILY DECLINED IN RECENT YEARS - BANCHERO COSTA
Colombia is the world’s fifth largest seaborne exporter of coal, coming after Australia, Indonesia, Russia and the USA.
Export ...
Wednesday, 01 July 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
It was beginning of 2020 – close to 6 months from now – when we first experienced the huge impact of the COVID 19 outbreak on Ship Repa ...
Monday, 29 June 20
INDONESIAN COAL AT THE MERCY OF THE DRAGON AND TIGER - GHEE PEH | IEEFA
Coal sector analysts have been busy in recent months mapping the negative impact of low coal prices from the COVID-19 pandemic on Indonesian coal c ...
Monday, 29 June 20
FALLING DEMAND IN CHINA AND INDIA SIGNAL TOUGH TIMES AHEAD FOR INDONESIAN EXPORTS - GHEE PEH | EEFA
Assessing the Impact on Indonesian Coal Companies
The bad news for Indonesia’s coal companies is that they are likely to have ...
Monday, 29 June 20
INDIA COAL IMPORT OUTLOOK: WEAK DEMAND, IMPORT SUBSTITUTION, EXPECT 20% YOY DECLINE - GHEE PEH | IEEFA
For India, the coal demand indicators have clearly turned negative.
According to Argus Media, since the government declared a ...
|
|
|
Showing 886 to 890 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PTC India Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
