We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 08 March 21
MARCH 2021 INDONESIA COAL PRICE REFERENCE SETTLES LOWER
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for March 2021 settles at US$ 84.49 per ton FOB vessel.
The Indonesia coal pr ...
Saturday, 06 March 21
AUSTRALIAN COAL: SOME WEAKNESS COULD MATERIALIZE AFTER THE WINTER - ING
Newcastle coal prices remain well supported for now, however as we move out of the winter months we would expect prices to come under pressure. Mea ...
Saturday, 06 March 21
ASIA SEABORNE COAL PRICES START TO RETREAT, CHINA-AUSTRALIA DISPUTE LINGERS - REUTERS
There are signs that the price and demand surge for coal during the recent colder-than-expected winter across North Asia is starting to ease, even ...
Thursday, 04 March 21
HEAD OF JBIC SAYS THE JAPANESE BANK WILL NOT FUND NEW COAL PLANT DEVELOPMENT - NHK NEWS
The governor of the Japan Bank for International Cooperation has said that the government-owned financial institution will stop funding new coal-fi ...
Wednesday, 03 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Following the recent rally to multi year highs of metal-based commodities, amid an unprecedented global economic stimulus, discussions of an emergi ...
|
|
|
Showing 626 to 630 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PTC India Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- White Energy Company Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
|
| |
| |
|
