We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Monday, 01 April 19
FORCE MAJEURE SUCCESS NOT A SEA CHANGE - BALTIC EXCHANGE
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
It is difficult to successfully argue that contractual performance has been prevented or delayed by force majeure. This is in part because English courts or arbitration tribunals will interpret these clauses strictly and narrowly against the party seeking to rely on them.
Recent decisions, including Triple Point Technology v PTT (2017) and Seadrill Ghana v Tullow Ghana (2018), are evidence of this approach. However, Sucden Middle-East, represented by Nick Fisher of HFW, has recently relied successfully on such a clause in the Commercial Court, on appeal from arbitration.
The case, Sucden Middle-East v Yagci Denizcilik Ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi, “The Mv Muammer Yagci”, involved a shipment of sugar to Algeria on the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form. The facts found by the arbitral tribunal were that when the cargo arrived in Algeria, the cargo-receivers submitted false import documents to local customs authorities. The local customs responded by seizing the cargo, using powers under customs laws and regulations.
A delay to discharging the cargo of four and a half months ensued. Sucden, as charterers, claimed this delay fell within the exceptions to laytime running under clause 28. Owners disagreed. At first instance, the arbitral tribunal agreed with owners.
Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court. Permission to bring the appeal was given on the basis that the question of law was one of general public importance, as it related to a standard form contract in wide commercial usage.
The judgement
The question before the Commercial Court was: “Where a cargo is seized by the local customs authorities at the discharge port causing a delay to discharge, is the time so lost caused by ‘government interferences’ within the meaning of clause 28 of the Sugar Charter Party 1999 form?” Clause 28 reads:
“Strikes and Force Majeure
In the event that whilst at or off the loading place or discharging place the loading and/or discharging of the vessel is prevented or delayed by any of the following occurrences: strikes, riots, civil commotions, lockouts of men, accidents and/or breakdowns on railways, stoppages on railway and/or river and/or canal by ice or frost, mechanical breakdowns at mechanical loading plants, government interferences, vessel being inoperative or rendered inoperative due to terms and conditions of employment of the Officers and Crew, time so lost shall not count as laytime on demurrage or detention…”
In deciding whether a force majeure event had occurred, the Court focused on the construction of “government interferences”. It was fairly straightforward to establish that a government entity acting in a sovereign capacity was involved, but owners argued that the government being involved was not enough and that there had to be “interferences”. In reaching its decision that there had been no interference, the tribunal had considered it a key point that seizure was an “ordinary” action. The Court rejected this conclusion. It held that the seizure of the cargo was not routine and did fall within the meaning of “interferences”. Seizure is a significant exercise of executive power and therefore could not be regarded as “ordinary”. Suspected or predictable consequences are not the same as ordinary actions (such as the inspection of the cargo by a government surveyor): “In the usual course of things, cargo is not seized and property rights are not invaded in that way.” The very fact that false documents were involved showed that the circumstances were not routine.
The Court emphasised that it was of “real importance” that its conclusion on the language was not difficult to apply, nor did it in any way offend commercial common sense.
The owners’ causation argument was also dismissed, as it was held that the seizure caused the delay, even if the submission of false documents caused the seizure.
Further detail
In allowing the appeal, the Court still maintained the strict and narrow approach to force majeure, stressing that “the answer given to the question is only a narrow ‘yes’. It is ‘yes’ where the circumstances are as in the present case. The answer does not address all of the circumstances that may come within or fall outside clause 28. The answer is concerned only with the seizure of a cargo and with that seizure by a customs authority that is a State revenue authority acting in a sovereign capacity”.
This judgment gives some welcome publicly-available guidance on the interpretation of a force majeure clause in a standard form widely used in sugar trading. While the charterers were successfully able to rely on the force majeure clause in this case, it does not signal a change in the strict and narrow approach typically adopted by the English courts.
Source: Baltic Exchange
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 12 March 21
INDIA SHOULD FOCUS ON REDUCING COAL POWER GENERATION INSTEAD OF CAPACITY - IEEFA
Nearly half of existing coal power in India is more expensive than new renewable power
To get to its ambitious climate targets, Indi ...
Friday, 12 March 21
BATTERIES ARE REPLACING COAL NOT GAS - IEEFA
No amount of government subsidies can halt gas’s decline
Batteries are replacing coal not gas.
Today the early ...
Friday, 12 March 21
RENEWABLES SHOULD BE FOCUS OF VIETNAM’S DRAFT PDP8, NOT COAL AND GAS - IEEFA
Evidence was clear to inform the next stage of Vietnam’s power development
Vietnam’s recently published draft power deve ...
Thursday, 11 March 21
U.S. TO PRODUCE 581 MMST IN 2021, UP 8% FROM 2020 - EIA
EIA expects U.S. coal production to total 581 MMst in 2021, 42 MMst (8%) more than in 2020. In 2022, EIA expects coal production to rise by a furth ...
Thursday, 11 March 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Assessing the ship repair sector during the first months of 2021, we have come across a new era in which Owners chose the shipyards to repair their ...
|
|
|
Showing 621 to 625 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
