We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 23 September 16
"COLLATERAL LIES" DO NOT NECESSARILY UNDERMINE AN INSURANCE CLAIM
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
An insured was not precluded from recovering under an insurance policy even though it had made a false statement during the claims process with a view to strengthening its claim. The Supreme Court in Versloot Dredging BV & anr v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG [2016] UKSC 45 considered the extent of the fraudulent claims rule which applies to insurance contracts and prevents an insured recovering under an insurance policy where the claim is fabricated or exaggerated. The Supreme Court held (Lord Mance dissenting) that this rule does not apply to false statements that are immaterial to an insured’s right to recovery under the policy. Insurers have expressed their concern at the decision.
The claimant ship owners suffered irreparable damage of a vessel’s engine after the engine room was flooded, causing a loss of EUR 3,241 million, which they sought to recover from the defendant insurers. The ship owners had falsely stated, in response to inquiries made by the insurers, that an alarm had sounded but that no action had been taken by the crew as the alarm was attributed to the ship rolling in heavy seas. In actual fact no alarm had sounded. The ship owners had been frustrated by the insurers’ delay in recognising the claim and this statement was intended to reassure the insurers that the ship was seaworthy with fully operational alarm systems. They believed that this statement would fortify the claim and accelerate payment.
The alarm statement was later discovered to be false, but was irrelevant to the validity of the claim. Although the alarm had not sounded, it was tested shortly after the incident and found to be working. Even if it had not been working, Popplewell J at first instance held that this would not assist the insurers as the alarm’s failure to sound would not have been the proximate cause of the loss. Popplewell J concluded that the loss was caused by a peril of the seas covered by the insurance policy. Nevertheless, Popplewell J held that the insurers were entitled to repudiate the entire claim under the ship owners’ insurance policy as a result of this false statement. The ship owners appealed, with the Court of Appeal upholding the decision.
Fraudulent and exaggerated claims
At common law it is well established that if an insured makes a fraudulent or exaggerated claim on its insurer, the insured loses the right to recover the entirety of that claim, including any genuine losses it would have obtained. The law refuses to sever the honest part of the claim from the invented part.1 This is commonly referred to as the “fraudulent claims rule”.
Section 12 of the Insurance Act 2015 (which came into force on 12 August 2016) has preserved this rule. It does not, however, define what constitutes a fraudulent claim and does not refer to a situation where a valid claim is supported by a false statement.
Collateral lies and fraudulent devices
The extension of the common law rule to justified claims supported by false statements is more recent and controversial. Lord Sumption referred to Agapitos v Agnew (The Aegeon) [2003] QB 556, where Lord Mance had considered, obiter, whether the fraudulent claims rule could apply to a lie made in the presentation of a claim which does not affect the merits of, or the amount of, the claim. This has been generally termed a “fraudulent device” (or, adopting Lord Sumption’s expression, a “collateral lie”). Lord Mance considered that such collateral lies were also subject to the fraudulent claims rule.
The majority of the Supreme Court, with Lord Sumption giving the lead judgment, disagreed with this approach. Lord Sumption distinguished between a fraudulent exaggerated claim, which is designed to enable the insured to gain something which it is not entitled to, and a justified claim supported by a collateral lie. Where the lie is irrelevant to the existence or the amount the insured is entitled to, the insured gains nothing from the lie which he was not already entitled to by law and the insurer loses nothing from meeting a liability it already had (having crystallised at the moment of loss). The lie is therefore dishonest but the claim is not.
Lord Sumption concluded that it was disproportionately harsh to the insured and would go further than any legitimate commercial interest for the fraudulent claim rule to extend to collateral lies. The policy of deterrence did not justify such an extension of the rule.
COMMENT
The historic justification for the fraudulent claim rule was as a clear deterrent to fraudulent claims, recognising that insurers can be dependant on the insured for information, both at the formation of the contract and in the processing of claims. Honest policyholders would otherwise bear the financial burden of costs incurred by the insurers due to fraudulent or exaggerated claims, through increased premiums. As the judges recognised, fraudulent insurance claims are a serious issue, with insurance fraud widely perceived as victimless (a perception the judges emphasised was quite false).
However, this judgment prevents any extension of this rule and limits an insurer’s right to reject a claim. Although the decision has raised concerns within the insurance industry, it is far from being an invitation for an insured to embellish an insurance claim without fear of any consequences. Any attempt to enhance a claim which would result in increasing the amount recoverable will lead to forfeiture of the entirety of the claim if discovered. Even where a false statement is wholly collateral to a justified claim, an insured may be penalised for that statement if exposed. In the context of a contested claim, any settlement agreement induced by the false statement could be set aside. Moreover, there could be cost orders in any proceedings, increased premiums and difficulty in obtaining future insurance policies after the requirement to disclose the insured’s claims history in any insurance proposal is met. Insureds will also want to avoid litigation concerning whether a false statement is collateral or not to a justified claim.
Finally, insurers can consider including clauses in insurance contracts precluding the recovery of any claims supported by collateral lies. It is likely that going forward insurers will seek legal advice as to the merits of doing so.
Source: Allen & Overy
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 October 16
MARKET INSIGHT - LINOS KOGEVINAS
Another Monday has gone by, bringing with it further turbulence for oil. A series of meetings between high-production nations Russia & Saudi Ar ...
Wednesday, 12 October 16
INDIAN STEELMAKERS' DELEVERAGING AT RISK ON COKING COAL PRICE JUMP - FITCH
The sharp increase in coking coal prices since August 2016 could squeeze Indian steelmakers' profitability and threaten their deleveraging, Fit ...
Wednesday, 12 October 16
UK SEABORNE COAL IMPORT PLUNGES 64% AS A WORRYING TREND LURKS - BIMCO
The main exporters of thermal coal for coal- fired power plants to the United Kingdom (UK) have experienced a heavy decline in seaborne cargo volum ...
Monday, 10 October 16
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE HITS HIGHEST LEVELS SINCE SEPTEMBER 2014
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal benchmark price hits to its highest level since September 2014. The government declared benchmark prices for Indon ...
Monday, 10 October 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET FIRMS UP ON STRONG CAPE PERFORMANCE
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities rose again and ending in a positive note this past week. ...
|
|
|
Showing 2256 to 2260 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PTC India Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
