We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 23 September 16
"COLLATERAL LIES" DO NOT NECESSARILY UNDERMINE AN INSURANCE CLAIM
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
An insured was not precluded from recovering under an insurance policy even though it had made a false statement during the claims process with a view to strengthening its claim. The Supreme Court in Versloot Dredging BV & anr v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG [2016] UKSC 45 considered the extent of the fraudulent claims rule which applies to insurance contracts and prevents an insured recovering under an insurance policy where the claim is fabricated or exaggerated. The Supreme Court held (Lord Mance dissenting) that this rule does not apply to false statements that are immaterial to an insured’s right to recovery under the policy. Insurers have expressed their concern at the decision.
The claimant ship owners suffered irreparable damage of a vessel’s engine after the engine room was flooded, causing a loss of EUR 3,241 million, which they sought to recover from the defendant insurers. The ship owners had falsely stated, in response to inquiries made by the insurers, that an alarm had sounded but that no action had been taken by the crew as the alarm was attributed to the ship rolling in heavy seas. In actual fact no alarm had sounded. The ship owners had been frustrated by the insurers’ delay in recognising the claim and this statement was intended to reassure the insurers that the ship was seaworthy with fully operational alarm systems. They believed that this statement would fortify the claim and accelerate payment.
The alarm statement was later discovered to be false, but was irrelevant to the validity of the claim. Although the alarm had not sounded, it was tested shortly after the incident and found to be working. Even if it had not been working, Popplewell J at first instance held that this would not assist the insurers as the alarm’s failure to sound would not have been the proximate cause of the loss. Popplewell J concluded that the loss was caused by a peril of the seas covered by the insurance policy. Nevertheless, Popplewell J held that the insurers were entitled to repudiate the entire claim under the ship owners’ insurance policy as a result of this false statement. The ship owners appealed, with the Court of Appeal upholding the decision.
Fraudulent and exaggerated claims
At common law it is well established that if an insured makes a fraudulent or exaggerated claim on its insurer, the insured loses the right to recover the entirety of that claim, including any genuine losses it would have obtained. The law refuses to sever the honest part of the claim from the invented part.1 This is commonly referred to as the “fraudulent claims rule”.
Section 12 of the Insurance Act 2015 (which came into force on 12 August 2016) has preserved this rule. It does not, however, define what constitutes a fraudulent claim and does not refer to a situation where a valid claim is supported by a false statement.
Collateral lies and fraudulent devices
The extension of the common law rule to justified claims supported by false statements is more recent and controversial. Lord Sumption referred to Agapitos v Agnew (The Aegeon) [2003] QB 556, where Lord Mance had considered, obiter, whether the fraudulent claims rule could apply to a lie made in the presentation of a claim which does not affect the merits of, or the amount of, the claim. This has been generally termed a “fraudulent device” (or, adopting Lord Sumption’s expression, a “collateral lie”). Lord Mance considered that such collateral lies were also subject to the fraudulent claims rule.
The majority of the Supreme Court, with Lord Sumption giving the lead judgment, disagreed with this approach. Lord Sumption distinguished between a fraudulent exaggerated claim, which is designed to enable the insured to gain something which it is not entitled to, and a justified claim supported by a collateral lie. Where the lie is irrelevant to the existence or the amount the insured is entitled to, the insured gains nothing from the lie which he was not already entitled to by law and the insurer loses nothing from meeting a liability it already had (having crystallised at the moment of loss). The lie is therefore dishonest but the claim is not.
Lord Sumption concluded that it was disproportionately harsh to the insured and would go further than any legitimate commercial interest for the fraudulent claim rule to extend to collateral lies. The policy of deterrence did not justify such an extension of the rule.
COMMENT
The historic justification for the fraudulent claim rule was as a clear deterrent to fraudulent claims, recognising that insurers can be dependant on the insured for information, both at the formation of the contract and in the processing of claims. Honest policyholders would otherwise bear the financial burden of costs incurred by the insurers due to fraudulent or exaggerated claims, through increased premiums. As the judges recognised, fraudulent insurance claims are a serious issue, with insurance fraud widely perceived as victimless (a perception the judges emphasised was quite false).
However, this judgment prevents any extension of this rule and limits an insurer’s right to reject a claim. Although the decision has raised concerns within the insurance industry, it is far from being an invitation for an insured to embellish an insurance claim without fear of any consequences. Any attempt to enhance a claim which would result in increasing the amount recoverable will lead to forfeiture of the entirety of the claim if discovered. Even where a false statement is wholly collateral to a justified claim, an insured may be penalised for that statement if exposed. In the context of a contested claim, any settlement agreement induced by the false statement could be set aside. Moreover, there could be cost orders in any proceedings, increased premiums and difficulty in obtaining future insurance policies after the requirement to disclose the insured’s claims history in any insurance proposal is met. Insureds will also want to avoid litigation concerning whether a false statement is collateral or not to a justified claim.
Finally, insurers can consider including clauses in insurance contracts precluding the recovery of any claims supported by collateral lies. It is likely that going forward insurers will seek legal advice as to the merits of doing so.
Source: Allen & Overy
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 18 October 16
COAL PRICES KEPT CLIMBING
COALspot.com: A rally in thermal coal prices over the past few months, after years of decline, is still continuing and it is expected to rally at l ...
Tuesday, 18 October 16
PANAMAX: A FAIRLY POSITIVE END TO THE WEEK - ALLIED
Capesize
Things seemed to be moving sideways during the first half of the week, with resistance being felt as owners tried to resist any further ...
Monday, 17 October 16
THE FREIGHT MARKET WAS SOFTENED IN ALL SEGMENTS THIS PAST WEEK - VISTAAR
COALspot.com: The Baltic Exchange, tracking rates for ships carrying dry bulk commodities decline slightly and ending in a negative note this past ...
Friday, 14 October 16
SUPRAMAXES: DELIVERY SINGAPORE ARE SETTLING AROUND HIGH 6K'S FOR COAL TRIPS TO CHINA VIA INDO - FEARNLEY
Supramax
Wait and see attitude prevailing all over the market.
There have been several fresh cargoes, which have been efficiently covered by ...
Friday, 14 October 16
U.S. SHIPPED 3.3 MMST COAL IN JULY 2016; DECLINE 40% M/M
COALspot.com – U.S., the world’s second largest coal producers have produced approximately totalled an estimated 16.6 million short ton ...
|
|
|
Showing 2251 to 2255 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Planning Commission, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The University of Queensland
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
