We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 17 September 15
LOW DEMAND PUSH COAL SWAP DOWN
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery 4Q 2015 declined month on month and gain week over week.
The 4Q swap declined $ 1.77 (-4.17%) ...
Thursday, 17 September 15
MARKET INSIGHT - KONSTANTINOS KONTOMICHIS
Having experienced, as it was much anticipated, a poor 1st half combined with negative forecasts, summer, in sharp contrast, proved to be more hope ...
Wednesday, 16 September 15
SLOWER GROWTH IN WORLD COAL DEMAND AND LOWER INTERNATIONAL COAL PRICES LED A DECLINE IN INDONESIAN COAL PRODUCTION
COALspot.com: Slower growth in world coal demand particularly China and lower international coal prices have led to a decline in Indonesian coal pr ...
Wednesday, 16 September 15
HIGHER TAXES COULD LEAD GREEK SHIP OWNERS OUT OF THE COUNTRY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
A potential taxation overhaul of the shipping industry in Hellas, which could see the loss of particular tax benefits for ship owners, could lead t ...
Tuesday, 15 September 15
WORLD SEABORNE TRADE: ENTERING INTO A ROLE REVERSAL? - CLARKSONS
Over the past decade, world seaborne trade growth has been dominated by dry bulk and container trade. However, developments in the global economy t ...
|
|
|
Showing 2811 to 2815 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
