We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 14 August 15
CONDITIONS AND COMPLEXITIES IN A TRIPARTITE AGREEMENT: BE SPECIFIC! - INCE & CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
A tripartite agreement reached between the Owners, the Shippers and the Receivers provided that demurrage be paid to the Owners in the event that the Owners were found not liable for cargo contamination by an arbitration tribunal. The tripartite agreement was not specific as to which arbitration involving which parties would trigger the obligation for demurrage to be paid. The Court held that a party’s obligations under the tripartite agreement could not be triggered by an arbitration when that party was not part of the arbitration reference.
The circumstances and the judgment highlight the importance of specificity when drafting settlement agreements. This is especially the case where there are contingencies for future events and where more than two parties are involved.
The background facts
A cargo of wheat was purchased by North Star Co ICC (the “Receivers”) from Casillo Commodities Italia SpA (the “Shippers”). By a voyage charter dated 12 March 2012 between Seaglance Maritime (the “Owners”) and the Shippers/Charterers, the Owners agreed to carry the cargo from Paranaguá, Brazil to Benghazi, Libya on board the M/V Proikonissos (the “Vessel”).
Discharge commenced at Benghazi on 2 June. On 3 June, traces of soya bean and soya bean meal were discovered in the cargo and the Libyan authorities at Benghazi refused to allow the remaining cargo to be discharged.
The Shippers agreed to pay US$33,000 in additional freight to the Owners, in consideration for carrying the remaining cargo from Benghazi to Tripoli, Libya to complete discharging. However, on arrival at Tripoli, the Libyan authorities refused to allow the sampling or discharging of the remaining cargo.
The Owners, Shippers and Receivers entered into discussions to decide where to discharge the remaining cargo. During these discussions, the Owners commenced arbitration against the Shippers under the voyage charter, and against the Receivers under the bill of lading. The discussions resulted in a written agreement between the Owners, Shippers and Receivers dated 27 June (the “Tripartite Agreement”).
The Tripartite Agreement
The Tripartite Agreement provided that the Vessel would sail to Malta to discharge the remaining cargo in consideration for a further lump sum freight of US$23,000, and for the applicable bills of lading to be returned and reissued, as appropriate. The Vessel sailed to Malta and successfully completed discharge of the remainder of the cargo on 3 July. Disputes arose concerning liability for the cargo contamination and demurrage.
The Tripartite Agreement expressly defined the “Dispute” to be the dispute as to responsibility for the cargo contamination.
As the Dispute was unresolved at the time the Tripartite Agreement was drafted, it provided for specified contingencies in the event that the Owners were or were not found liable in relation to the Dispute. The contingency in question was applicable to the laytime and demurrage payable to Owners:
“Clause 4:
… (a) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal to be liable in relation to the Dispute it is agreed that laytime under the Charterparty will be deemed to have been interrupted when discharging was interrupted in Benghazi, and will re-start at 0800 the working day after tendering NOR.
(b) If Seaglance [Owners] are found by an English Arbitration tribunal not to be liable in relation to the Dispute, it is agreed that the Vessel will be deemed to have been on demurrage from the expiry of laytime at Benghazi (with the exception of 1.5 days steaming time from Benghazi to Tripoli and 16 hours steaming time from Tripoli to Malta regardless of the actual steaming time) which demurrage will be earned day by day or pro rata at the rate of US$11,250 per day without any exception whatsoever until completion of discharging. Such demurrage to be paid as per clause 60 of the Charterparty.
(c) If the Dispute is resolved by negotiation then the question of whether (a) or (b) above applies will be determined in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of this Agreement.”
The Tripartite Agreement did not provide for circumstances in which there were multiple arbitrations. More specifically, the Tripartite Agreement did not state by which tribunal Owners were to be found liable or not in order to trigger clause 4.
Arbitration proceedings
In the arbitration commenced by the Owners against the Shippers, each party appointed an arbitrator but no further substantive steps were taken.
However, in the arbitration commenced by the Owners against Receivers, the Tribunal was fully constituted and the matter proceeded to a hearing. This was unknown to the Shippers. The Owners sought a declaration from the Tribunal that the Owners were not liable in respect of the cargo contamination.
The Receivers initially argued that the Owners were liable for the cargo contamination but, shortly before the hearing, agreed to withdraw their defence and counter-claim, and wrote to the Tribunal to that effect. The Tribunal proceeded to issue an award declaring that the Owners were not liable for the alleged cargo contamination.
The Owners sought to use this award to claim demurrage in the agreed amount of US$ 218,936 from the Shippers pursuant to clause 4(b) of the Tripartite Agreement. The Shippers disputed that the award was applicable to clause 4(b) and refused to pay the demurrage claimed.
The question put to the Court was whether an award issued in the arbitration between the Owners and the Receivers was capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b) as between
Owners and Shippers.
The Shippers argued that only an arbitration to which the Shippers were a party could be capable of triggering the obligations under clause 4(b). The Owners argued that an award which was solely in relation to the “Dispute”, being the cargo contamination, was enough to trigger the Shippers’ obligations under the clause.
The Commercial Court decision
The Shippers were successful in their application for summary judgment.
The Court held that the Shippers were unlikely to have intended to bind their conditional obligations under the Tripartite Agreement to an arbitration to which they were not a party.
To have intended otherwise would mean that the Shippers would have waived their rights to present their own evidence, to submit their own arguments and, ultimately, forgo any right to control the arbitration.
The Court also found that there were three possible claims contemplated under the Tripartite Agreement:
a claim brought by the Receivers against the Owners under the bill of lading for the contamination of cargo;
a claim brought by the Owners against the Shippers under the charterparty in respect of demurrage; and,
a claim brought by the Shippers against the Owners under the charterparty for the cargo contamination.
Clause 4 dealt only with any laytime and demurrage claim: the second of the three disputes above. The Court held, therefore, that it was only intended to be applicable in respect of a laytime and demurrage dispute rather than all three possible disputes.
Comment
The practical problems regarding the discharge of cargo were resolved on a commercial basis by the Tripartite Agreement. However, some of the provisions in the Tripartite Agreement were found to be ambiguous; this led to confusion and dispute when the time came to enforce its terms.
It is of paramount importance in any agreement, regardless of the complexity, that the exact obligations of each party are expressly stated, and the circumstances under which those obligations are to be performed are clearly set out.
Source: Ince & Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 21 September 15
KOMIPO OF KOREA INVITES BIDS FOR BITUMINOUS COAL
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender for 390,000 Metric Tons (MT) of minimum 4,600 kcal ...
Sunday, 20 September 15
BALTIC CAPE INDEX ROSE 66.52 PER CENT AND STAND NOW AT 1995 POINTS
COALspot.com: The BDI (Baltic Dry Index) rose 17.35 per cent week over week to 960 points on Friday mainly driven by the Capesize segment. The Cape ...
Friday, 18 September 15
SHIPPING AND THE FED RATE DECISION: FINANCING COSTS COULD RISE EVEN HIGHER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Regardless of the FED’s decision to raise rates, shipping stands to be influenced by the decision. Shipbroker Allied Shipbroking noted this w ...
Friday, 18 September 15
U.S. COAL PRODUCTION DECLINED 6.7 PER CENT W-W: EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer has produced approximately totaled an estimated 17.4 million shor ...
Thursday, 17 September 15
COALSPOT HAS LAUNCHED NEW THERMAL COAL INDICES FOR INDONESIAN COAL
COALspot.com has today launched real-time CS (i) Coal Indices.
The Indices represents 3800 kcal/kg GAR, 4200 kcal/kg GAR, 5000 kcal/kg GAR a ...
|
|
|
Showing 2806 to 2810 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
