We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 31 January 12
THERE ARE MANY GOOD REASONS FOR COAL IN GERMANY - DR CIESLIK
COALspot.com - "The year 2011 was again marked by many changes on the markets and energy policies, at times in line with expectations, but at o ...
Tuesday, 31 January 12
DRY BULK MARKET KEEPS FALLING FOR WORST MONTH IN YEARS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market didn't manage to put a halt in its downfall, with the industry's benchmark, the BDI (Baltic Dry Index), posting yet another fa ...
Monday, 30 January 12
CHINA'S HUNGER FOR COAL LEAVES DENT IN PENNSYLVANIA'S SUPPLY - THOMAS LESKIN
With the price of heating oil on the rise, one of Pennsylvania's greatest natural resources - coal - is in high demand, and not just locally.
Et ...
Saturday, 28 January 12
WILL FREIGHT MARKET STABILIZE FROM NEXT WEEK?
COALspot.com - The markets continued to soften with BDI at 663 points down by 15.78 pct closing at 726 points and cape index was down by 5.73 pct cl ...
Friday, 27 January 12
DEMOLITION ACTIVITY NEEDS TO INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY THIS YEAR AS WELL - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The oversupply of vessels in most shipping sectors is so intense that it’s become clear to ship owners that unless they scrap as many of their ...
|
|
|
Showing 4866 to 4870 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PTC India Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
