We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 04 February 12
SUPRAMAX DELIVERY SOUTH CHINA FOR TRIPS VIA INDONESIA WERE REPORTED AROUND $ 6,000 PER DAY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The markets continued to soften which dropped by almost 11 pct and BDI closing at 647 points.
The drop in BDI was mainly due to dr ...
Thursday, 02 February 12
NO RELIEF YET FOR DRY BULK SHIP OWNERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Although at the start of 2012 nobody can claim that the global seaborne trade has suddenly come to a halt, quite the contrary, it seems that the dry ...
Wednesday, 01 February 12
KRISHNAPATNAM PORT - GOING DEEP TO SOAR HIGH
COALspot.com - Krishnapatnam Port now rightfully claims as the deepest draft port in India, as it has started accepting vessels with maximum permiss ...
Wednesday, 01 February 12
IN JAMBI, MOST MINING COMPANIES LACK 'CLEAR-AND-CLEAN' PERMITS - JP
More than three-quarters of the 386 mining companies in Jambi lack “clear-and-clean” certifications from the government, according to an ...
Wednesday, 01 February 12
2% OF IBPS TOTAL CONCESSION AREA CONTAINS TOTAL COAL RESOURCE OF 56.1 MILLION TON
COALspot.com - PT. Britmindo, a mine consulting firm, has finalized PT. Insani Bara Perkasa (IBP) first JORC (Joint Ore Reserves Committee) res ...
|
|
|
Showing 4861 to 4865 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
|
| |
| |
|
