We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 01 March 12
INDO-INDIA, LARGE ECO SUPRA CAN FETCH CLOSE TO USD 9K DOP N.CHINA - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Atlantic Handysize market did not see any signs for recovery this week. It is still a major lack of spot cargoes and an oversupply of pro ...
Wednesday, 29 February 12
69 MINERS AGREE TO RENEGOTIATE CONTRACTS - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post, one of the leading English news papaer in Indonesia reported that, as many as 60 coal contracts-of-work (PKP2B) and nine non-coal ...
Wednesday, 29 February 12
PUTTING COAL GASIFICATION TO WORK
Clifford Reese of the SSOE Group looks at practical solutions for district energy leaders who wish to implement clean coal technology.
Coal fuels ...
Monday, 27 February 12
COAL MINING PROFITS TOO HIGH, SAYS GOVT - TEMPO INTERACTIVE
Tempo Interactive reported that, Energy and Mineral Resources Deputy Minister of Indonesia Widjajono Partowidagdo has criticized coal-mining compani ...
Monday, 27 February 12
INDONESIAN COAL EXPORTS TO CHINA DROPS 39.76 PERCENT IN JANUARY 2012
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest coal exporter, shipped 28.21* mln mt of coal in January 2012, slightly lower than its December 2011 ...
|
|
|
Showing 4831 to 4835 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Coal Association
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The University of Queensland
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
|
| |
| |
|