We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 05 March 12
SOME RESOURCE TITANS NOT THRILLED WITH INDONESIAN EXPORT BAN - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, local representatives of major business associations in East Kalimantan have protested a government regulation that ...
Monday, 05 March 12
WEEKLY DRY MARKET OVERVIEW - MARIA BERTZELETOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
An air of optimism poured in the market this week for dry bulk shippers with the Baltic Dry Index recording daily gains during the end of February b ...
Sunday, 04 March 12
SE ASIA WAS FIRM FOR TRIPS TO INDIA AND CHINA - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - This week saw another upward trend with all indices up and generally market was firm.
The BDI was up by 7.38 pct closing at 771 po ...
Friday, 02 March 12
DJMBP HAS ANNOUNCED SECOND BATCH OF CLEAR N CLEAN CERTIFIED MINERS
COALspot.com - The Directorate general of mineral & coal of Indonesia has announced second batch of companies who have passed IUP Clear and Clea ...
Thursday, 01 March 12
BUKIT ASAM TARGETS EUROPEAN INVESTORS
COALspot.com - PT. Bukit Asam (persero) Tbk, Indonesian state owned coal miner is planning to conduct road show in Europe next week to target at Eur ...
|
|
|
Showing 4826 to 4830 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Planning Commission, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
|
| |
| |
|
