We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 03 May 12
DRY BULK MARKET REMAINS INACTIVE, POSTING MILD DECREASE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept retreating this week, although at a very low pace, on the back of a lull in demand. The industry's benchmark, th ...
Thursday, 03 May 12
MINERS DEMAND LEGAL CERTAINTY ON PRE-BAN INTERIM POLICY - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, Mining companies represented by the Indonesian Mining Association (IMA) welcomed the government’s plan to impo ...
Thursday, 03 May 12
HANDY EAST COAST INDIA - CHINA AROUND USD 7000 - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy - Stable demand in the Atlantic offered good rates for the tonnage.
USG/Cont was worth USD 17500 and more. Baltic and Black Sea appeared to ...
Wednesday, 02 May 12
CHINA BLACKOUTS HIGHLIGHT PRICING POLICY WEAKNESS - FITCH
Fitch reported that, the likelihood of further electricity blackouts in China this summer underlines Fitch's view of the basic problem f ...
Tuesday, 01 May 12
VIETNAM FEARS IT MAY NOT SEEK COAL SUPPLIES - TBKTSG / VIETNAMNET BRIDGE
TBKTSG / VietNamNet Bridge reported that, with five coal-run thermopower plants under construction, PetroVietnam alone would need 18 million tons of ...
|
|
|
Showing 4741 to 4745 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
|
| |
| |
|
