We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 12 May 12
THE SHIPPING MARKET IS UNLIKELY TO SEE A REBOUND ANYTIME SOON - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com - The BDI softened this week and it was down by 1.64 pct closing at 1,138 points.
The cape index was up by 2.41 pct closing at 1,61 ...
Friday, 11 May 12
POLITICAL CHANGES COULD LEAD TO TEMPORARY HALT IN SHIPPING INVESTMENTS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The potential of changes of political leadership in many of the world’s leading economies could very well lead to significant shifts in the di ...
Thursday, 10 May 12
DRY BULK ERRATIC ON LACK OF DIRECTION - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept up its erratic behavior as it went down again during yesterday’s session, on a lack of direct guidance in terms o ...
Wednesday, 09 May 12
COAL INDIA SIGNS FSAS WITH 13 POWER UNITS SO FAR - PTI
Press Trust of India has reported that, coal India has so far entered into fuel supply pacts with 13 power units, including Reliance Power's Rosa P ...
Tuesday, 08 May 12
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR NEW DIRECTION THIS WEEK - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
With the BDI (Baltic Dry Index) the main benchmark of the dry bulk shipping industry not traded at the start of this week, traders, charterers and s ...
|
|
|
Showing 4731 to 4735 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The University of Queensland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|