We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 29 December 12
SHIPBREAKING YARDS IN INDIA DEMOLISH A TOTAL OF 527 VESSELS IN 2012, BREAKING ALL PREVIOUS RECORDS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
India's ship demolition experts of Star Matrix contemplated this week on the issue of why ships in the range of 1,000 and up to 6,500 liquid tons ( ...
Thursday, 27 December 12
A LOOK AT WORLD TRADE PATTERNS DURING 2013 - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
While China's leaders are likely to stick with the 2012 economic growth rate of 7.5% when they chart a course for 2013 - its weakest pace since 199 ...
Thursday, 27 December 12
INDONESIA SHIPPED 33.578* MMT COAL IN NOVEMBER
COALspot.com: Indonesia, the world largest multi grade coal exporter has shipped 33.578* million tons of coal in November 2012. thi ...
Wednesday, 26 December 12
UPDATE ON EXPORT BAN ON RAW MINERALS AND ORE - RITA SUSANTO
COALspot.com - In May 2012, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources (“MoEMR”) in Regulation No.7 (“Reg-7”, amended by R ...
Wednesday, 26 December 12
SHIP OWNERS WRAP UP NEWBUILDING DEALS PRIOR TO YEAR END - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As the year inches closer and closer to its end, many ship owners are looking to close deals for newbuilding vessels they have been negotiating duri ...
|
|
|
Showing 4446 to 4450 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
