We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 05 January 13
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2012 AND LOOKING FORWARD - BIMCO
Global Economy: Things will go up from here
The global economy continues to grow, albeit at a slower pace than previous years. The slower economic ...
Friday, 04 January 13
DRY BULK MARKET LOOKING FOR DIRECTION IN FIRST TRADING DAYS OF THE NEW YEAR - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market is actively looking for its footing at the start of the New Year, as charters have been scarce, as is usually the case during th ...
Thursday, 03 January 13
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL SWAPS CLOSED US$ 6.86 HIGHER FOR 2014 DELIVERY
COALspot.com - Swaps prices were changed positively for thermal coal for loading in the first quarter from Indonesia, according to SGX AsiaClear OTC ...
Thursday, 03 January 13
SUPRMAX FREIGHT RATE FROM RED SEA / INDIA IS AROUND MID TEENS - FEARNLEYS
Fearnleys in its weekly report said that, Indian market was very quiet in respect of export of iron ore. For Indo-India trip Supra rate was hovering ...
Thursday, 03 January 13
DRY BULK DEMAND TO KEEP RISING IN 2013, DRY BULK SHIP PRICES TO KEEP FALLING SAYS ANALYST - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In a recent report on the future of the shipping markets, DVB bank said that dry bulk demand is expected to keep on growing in the coming years, mai ...
|
|
|
Showing 4436 to 4440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Australian Coal Association
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
|
| |
| |
|
