We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 15 January 13
2ND MYANMAR MINING SUMMIT & OFFICIAL HOST MINISTRY OF MINES TO WELCOME OVER 200 DELEGATES NEXT WEEK
Press Release: The Ministry of Mines is hosting the 2nd Myanmar Mining Summit in Yangon on 21-24 January to unravel the local mining climate, prospe ...
Monday, 14 January 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 2.32 PERCENT LESS COAL W/E 14 JANUARY 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 3,123,312 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 14 January 2013, Newca ...
Monday, 14 January 13
THE COAL MONGOLIA - 2013 OFFICIALLY IN COOPERATION WITH TOP MINING COMPANIES
Press Release: Mongolian first mining portal site Mining.mn has already started its preparation of the International Conference “COAL MONGOLIA ...
Monday, 14 January 13
NTPC INVITES BIDS FOR 500K MT OF IMPORTED COAL
COALspot.com - NTPC Limited (formerly National Thermal Power Corporation) is the largest Indian state-owned electric utilities company called for a ...
Sunday, 13 January 13
THE FREIGHT MARKET: FAIRLY STEADY - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The freight market was fairly steady with all the indices up with maximum gain in the Panamax segment. The BDI was up by 7.65 pct clo ...
|
|
|
Showing 4421 to 4425 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
|
| |
| |
|
