We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 24 January 13
DRY BULK MARKET FALLS ON TROPICAL CYCLONE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has been on the downside during the past couple of days, mainly as a result of the tropical storm which forced ports to close do ...
Tuesday, 22 January 13
PORT OF ANTWERP HANDLES 7.0 PERCENT MORE COAL IN 2012 Y-Y
COALspot.com - The port of Antwerp handled 184,134,516 tonnes of freight last year.
This represents a drop of 1.6% compared with 2011, when the v ...
Monday, 21 January 13
NEWCASTLE PORT SHIPPED 10.21 PERCENT LESS COAL W/E 21 JANUARY 2013
COALspot.com - Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,804,152 MT of thermal and coking coal for week ended 0700 hours 21 January 2013, Newca ...
Monday, 21 January 13
PANAMAX DRY BULK CARRIERS AND AFRAMAX TANKERS PROVED TO BE THE "WEAPON OF CHOICE" FOR MOST SHIP OWNERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
With ship financing getting ever so difficult to procure during the past year or so, ship owners had to get creative in order to persuade banks and ...
Sunday, 20 January 13
Q1 & Q4 SUB-BIT FOB INDONESIA COAL SWAPS: FIRM
COALspot.com - Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) and CFR South China coal shipment for average Q1’ 2013 delivery have gained 0.81percent and ...
|
|
|
Showing 4411 to 4415 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- The University of Queensland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Economic Council, Georgia
- PTC India Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Planning Commission, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
