We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 25 July 13
CAPESIZE : PACIFIC AND ATLANTIC RATES ARE HOLDING STEADY - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
The Far East market remains quiet even if some Indo coal trip orders were fed in the market at early this week. Prompt ships passing Singapor ...
Thursday, 25 July 13
SUMMER LULL CHIPPING AWAY RECENT GAINS IN DRY BULK FREIGHT RATES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
In what seems to be establishing as a permanent trend, at least for the time being, the dry bulk market kept on retreating yesterday, even if this r ...
Tuesday, 23 July 13
NEWCASTLE'S COAL EXPORTS CLIMB 17.82% ON WEEK, PORT'S DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 3,369,865 tons of coal for the week ended 0700 hours 22 July 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. s ...
Monday, 22 July 13
DRY BULK MARKET DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRIVE CLAIMS SHIPBROKER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has seen a significant recovery in recent weeks, leading most ship classes to earnings above their operating expenses, thus brin ...
Monday, 22 July 13
INDO COAL SWAP FOR AUGUST 13 DELIVERY GAINED ON WEEK BUT LOST ON DAY AND MONTH
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average August 2013 delivery slightly up on week but fell on day and month on Fri ...
|
|
|
Showing 4196 to 4200 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Planning Commission, India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
