We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 30 July 13
AUSTRALIA'S NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 12.58 PERCENT LESS COAL W-O-W
COALspot.com: Newcastle port in Australia has loaded 2,945,848 tons of coal for the week ended 0700 hours 29 July 2013, Newcastle Port Corp. s ...
Monday, 29 July 13
INDONESIA'S ENERGY NEEDS COULD SPELL GOOD NEWS FOR TANKER OWNERS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite abundant energy resources, Indonesia has still failed meet its own demand, which led to a rising import of crude. According to the latest we ...
Sunday, 28 July 13
SUB-BIT INDONESIA COAL SWAP UP SLIGHTLY FOR SEPTEMBER CARGOES
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swaps (FOB ) for average September 2013 delivery slightly up on day and week but fell on month on ...
Saturday, 27 July 13
CEPL INDIA TO BAG 0.3 MILLION TONS OF COAL SUPPLY ORDER FROM TNPL
COALspot.com - An India based coal trader Coastal Energy Private Limited has offered the lowest price of US$ 73.00 per metric ton for calorific valu ...
Saturday, 27 July 13
INDONESIA TO INDIA SUPRAMAX FREIGHT RATES ARE EXPECTED TO REMAIN STEADY - CAPT.REDDY
COALspot.com : The freight market seemed to soften this week with BDI , Cape and Panamax indices dropped average 5 percent on week.
The BDI was d ...
|
|
|
Showing 4191 to 4195 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The University of Queensland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
|
| |
| |
|