We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 07 January 14
INDONESIA RAISES COAL PRICE THIS MONTH
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia has increased government declared coal bench mark price by US$ 1.59 / MT ...
Tuesday, 07 January 14
NEWCASTLE COAL TERMINAL'S COAL EXPORTS SLIDE TO 3.54 MMT W/E 30 DECEMBER 13
COALspot.com: In the week ended December 30, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.54 ...
Tuesday, 07 January 14
US COAL OUTPUT SLIDES 9 PCT WEEK ON WEEK, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, produced approximately 17.8 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Monday, 06 January 14
ARGUS LAUNCHES SPOT CFR EAST COAST INDIA COAL ASSESSMENTS
COALspot.com: Global energy and commodity news and price reporting agency Argus has announced today that, the company has launched CFR coal assessme ...
Monday, 06 January 14
INDONESIAN COAL SWAPS SLIDE TO $ 61.25 FOR Q4' 14 DELIVERY
COALspot.com – Sub-Bit Indonesia coal swap (FOB) for average Q1’ 14 delivery lost $ 0.32 pmt month on month on Friday 3 January 2014. Th ...
|
|
|
Showing 3921 to 3925 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- The University of Queensland
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|