We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 January 14
THE SHIPPING MARKET IN 2013 AND LOOKING FORWARD GLOBAL ECONOMY: STEADY AS SHE GOES UPWARDS - BIMCO
Over the past year, developed economies have gained traction while developing and emerging economies have suffered from slower growth. Despite key e ...
Wednesday, 08 January 14
DRY BULK MARKET PROSPECTS LOOKING BRIGHTER DESPITE SLOW START TO THE NEW YEAR - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
Despite the fact that the dry bulk market's benchmark, the BDI has been on a fall since the start of 2014, ending yesterday's session down to 1,87 ...
Wednesday, 08 January 14
AUSTRALIAN NEWCASTLE PORT'S WEEKLY COAL EXPORTS FALL
COALspot.com: In the week ended January 6, power plant and semi-soft coking coal shipments from the port of Newcastle in Queensland, totalled 3.27 m ...
Wednesday, 08 January 14
THE DRY BULK MARKET HAS LOST SOME OF ITS STEAM THESE PAST COUPLE OF DAYS: INTERMODAL
Chartering (Wet: Softer- / Dry: Softer- )
The Dry Bulk market has lost some of its steam these past couple of days although hires, espe ...
Wednesday, 08 January 14
SHIPPING: THE ABSOLUTE BOTTOM OF THE CYCLE WAS REACHED AND PASSED - GEORGE LAZARIDIS
COALspot.com: To many in the industry 2013 has been the turning point in the market where the absolute bottom of the cycle was reached and passed.
...
|
|
|
Showing 3916 to 3920 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PTC India Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- White Energy Company Limited
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
