We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 December 21
COAL LOCK-IN IN SOUTHEAST ASIA PRESENTS A CHALLENGE FOR THE ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK'S COAL RETIREMENT PLAN - IEEFA
In August, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) announced an ambitious plan to buy high emissions coal-fired power plants in Southeast Asia and retire ...
Saturday, 11 December 21
BUNKER BUYERS LOSE UP TO $5/MT FOR NOT COVERING ENOUGH SUPPLIERS - INTEGR8 FUELS
With the Brent price recently touching the $80 mark and before the Omicron variant concerns pushed it lower, bunker prices reached levels not seen ...
Tuesday, 07 December 21
SUPERCYCLE DEMAND: ARE WE THERE YET? - WOOD MACKENZIE
Taking young children on a long journey is fraught with challenges, not least the inevitable question a few minutes after leaving: are we there yet ...
Tuesday, 07 December 21
COAL WOULD REMAIN ENERGY LEADER FOR AT LEAST 15 YEARS - LIVEMINT
Coal India Ltd (CIL) has been in the eye of the storm after fuel stocks at coal-fuelled power plants depleted in October. Fuel stocks since are bei ...
Tuesday, 07 December 21
GLOBAL SHIPPING OUTLOOK TURNS STABLE FROM POSITIVE ON THE BACK OF PEAKING EARNINGS DURING 2021 - MOODY'S
The outlook for the global shipping industry is changed to stable from positive for the next 12 to 18 months due to demand slightly outstripping su ...
|
|
|
Showing 386 to 390 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PTC India Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Coal Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
|
| |
| |
|
