We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 23 December 21
COAL DEMAND TO PEAK IN INDIA BY 2030, WILL BACK UP RENEWABLES: NITI REPORT - BUSINESS STANDARD
Coal will remain India’s mainstay energy source and the country will shape global demand this decade, two reports have said a month after the ...
Thursday, 23 December 21
INDONESIA’S 2022 COAL OUTPUT SEEN BETWEEN 637 MLN-664 MLN T- OFFICIAL - REUTERS
Indonesia’s 2022 coal output is estimated at between 637 million to 664 million tonnes based on production plans currently being finalised, s ...
Thursday, 23 December 21
VALE ANNOUNCES THE SALE OF ITS COAL ASSETS
Vale informs that, on this date, it has entered into a binding agreement with Vulcan to sell the Moatize coal mine and the Nacala Logistics Corrido ...
Thursday, 23 December 21
INDIA: CAPTIVE POWER PRODUCERS URGE GOVT TO ENSURE NORMAL COAL SUPPLIES - PTI
A captive power producers’ association has urged the government for 100 per cent normalisation of coal supply to captive power producers whil ...
Thursday, 23 December 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As an outstanding year for the dry bulk freight market comes to a close, so does a thriving year for the SnP market which can only be compared to 2 ...
|
|
|
Showing 381 to 385 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- PTC India Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- The University of Queensland
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
|
| |
| |
|
