We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 21 February 14
INDONESIA PLAN TO CAP COAL OUTPUT AND HIKE ROYALTY; START MUSIC
COALspot.com: Energy and Mineral Resources Ministy of Indonesia is planning to increase the royalty for coal miners particularly for Mining Business ...
Friday, 21 February 14
THE WORLD'S SECOND LARGEST COAL MINER MINED 19.2 MMST OF COAL IN A WEEK, EIA SAYS
COALspot.com – United States the world’s second largest coal producer, mined approximately 19.2 million short tons (mmst) of coal in a w ...
Friday, 21 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET SHOWS SIGNS OF LIFE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The dry bulk market has slowly started to emerge from the downfall it's been since the start of the year, as rates have began to pick up over the c ...
Friday, 21 February 14
INDONESIA COAL OUTPUT CAP TO HURT MINERS RELIANT ON VOLUME GROWTH, FITCH SAYS
Fitch Ratings says that the credit profiles of mining sub-contractors and miners highly reliant on increasing volumes to support high debt servicing w ...
Thursday, 20 February 14
LENGTHY DELAYS TO PANAMA CANAL EXPANSION POSE GLOBAL TRADE RISKS; US COAL PRODUCERS TO GREATLY BENEFIT ONCE COMPLETE, SAYS WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie expects the recent cost overrun disputes around the Panama Canal expansion to be resolved with limited disruption due to the signific ...
|
|
|
Showing 3841 to 3845 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Economic Council, Georgia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|