We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 February 14
DRY BULK MARKET TO IMPROVE OVER THE COURSE OF 2014, BUT OVERSUPPLY STILL AN ISSUE SAYS BIMCO'S CHIEF SHIPPING ANALYST
As a gruelling first quarter edges closer to the end, dry bulk ship owners are looking at an improved second quarter demand, which, coupled with slo ...
Monday, 24 February 14
INDONESIAN SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL SWAP FOR DELIVERY APRIL - JUNE 2014 SLIDES TO $ 58.60 PMT
COALspot.com – Indonesia, the world’s the largest exporter of the thermal coal's swaps for delivery April - June 2014 slide week ended ...
Monday, 24 February 14
Q1 2015 DELIVERY COAL SWAP CLOSED AT 2.62% HIGHER THAN Q2 2014 CLOSING SWAPS
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swaps for average Q2 14 deliveries lost 2.68 percent month on month and closed at US$ 76.20 per mt as on Fr ...
Saturday, 22 February 14
SHIPPING POISED TO RALLY AFTER SEVERAL WEEKS OF DROP
COALspot.com: The freight market was steady to firm with the dry bulk index up by 6.24 pct closing at 1,175 points week on week and the cape index w ...
Saturday, 22 February 14
POTEN RAISES THE QUESTION OF ACCURACY IN CALCULATING TANKER FREIGHT RATES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
As the tanker market has grown in complexity over the course of the past few years, the question of whether the traditional methods of assessing rat ...
|
|
|
Showing 3836 to 3840 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- The University of Queensland
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
