We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 10 October 14
U.S. PRODUCED 83.2 MMST OF COAL IN SEPTEMBER, SAYS EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of largest coal producers, produced approximately 18.6 million short tons (mmst) of coal in ...
Thursday, 09 October 14
CAPESIZE MARKET HAS CONTINUED TO SHOW WEAKNESS - FEARNLEYS
Handy
We mentioned last week that after several weeks of rate increase for the Supras, the bigger Panamaxes started to snap up better paying Supr ...
Thursday, 09 October 14
SHIPPING REMAINS CHALLENGED AS GLOBAL GROWTH DISAPPOINTS - BIMCO
The global shipping industry finds no grace from much stronger economic activity going forward, as the global recovery remains fragile and uneven. ...
Wednesday, 08 October 14
CAPES RATE FOR THE W. AUSTRALIA TO CHINA VOYAGE MOVED TO BELOW $8/MT - INTERMODAL
The Dry Bulk market remained under pressure last week, with rates for Capes remaining on the red while those for Panamaxes managed to outperform th ...
Wednesday, 08 October 14
OIL COULD FALL TO USD80 BEFORE SHALE SUPPLY RESPONSE - FITCH
COALspot.com: Brent oil could fall as low as USD80 a barrel before triggering a self-correcting supply response with shale-oil drillers cutting inv ...
|
|
|
Showing 3441 to 3445 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Parliament of New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
