We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 15 October 14
NEWCASTLE SHIPPED 13.96 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN SEPTEMBER; UP 5.72%
COALspot.com: The Port of Newcastle, Australia’s major trading ports and the world’s largest coal export port, has shipped $1,227.7 wor ...
Tuesday, 14 October 14
KING COAL UNDER ATTACK? - EVA TZIMA
With the last quarter of the year being well underway and with no strong signs that the Dry Bulk market could be ready for a big positive reversal, ...
Tuesday, 14 October 14
THE NEW CHINESE TRANSPORTATION TAX LAW: WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR GREEK SHIPPING? - DELOITTE
China has recently promulgated a new law which imposes tax on profits from freights of inbound routes. The objective of the new tax law titled &ldq ...
Monday, 13 October 14
CHINESE COAL IMPORT TARIFFS YET ANOTHER BLOW TO AUSTRALIAN COAL EXPORTS - TIM BUCKLEY
COALspot.com: China’s unexpected move to reintroduce thermal coal import tariffs of 6% will have a materially negative impact on the viabilit ...
Monday, 13 October 14
NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP FOR Q1' 2015 DELIVERY CLOSED AT US$ 54.92, SGX DATA SHOWS
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for delivery Q4' 2014 decreased US$ 0.80 (-1.46%) month over month and US$ 0.52 (-0.95%) week over ...
|
|
|
Showing 3431 to 3435 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
|
| |
| |
|
