We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 08 February 15
BDI FELL CONTINUOUSLY HIT A THREE DECADES LOW
COALspot.com: This week Baltic Exchange Dry Freight Index (BDI) fell continuously hit a three decades low.
The BDI continuously fell and was d ...
Friday, 06 February 15
WEEKLY U.S. COAL PRODUCTION UP AN ESTIMATED 1.1% FROM LAST WEEK - EIA
COALspot.com – United States the world's one of the largest coal producers, produced approximately 20.1 million short tons (mmst) of coal ...
Friday, 06 February 15
SHIP DAMAGED BY FIRE CAUSED BY PIRATES FOUND TO BE CONSTRUCTIVE TOTAL LOSS - TAYLOR WESSING
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The High Court was asked to determine a number of preliminary issues, including whether a vessel was a constructive total ...
Thursday, 05 February 15
BDI HAS NOW FALLEN A LEVEL CLOSE TO THE INDEX'S HISTORIC LOW - INTERMODAL
They say a picture is worth a thousand words and in this instance just one look at the tables above is enough to understand the great pressure the ...
Thursday, 05 February 15
ULTRAMAX LEVELS FROM INDIA TO CHINA IN THE MID US$ 5000'S - FEARNLEYS AS
Handy
Despite the overall weak sentiment, there is a scent of optimism in the Atlantic market for ppt dates. Continent is still struggling with o ...
|
|
|
Showing 3211 to 3215 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Planning Commission, India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
|
| |
| |
|