We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 12 February 15
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE INCHED DOWN 1.44% IN FEBRUARY
COALspot.com - The Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources of Indonesia revised down Indonesian coal bench mark price this month to US$ 62.92 pe ...
Thursday, 12 February 15
NEWBUILDING ORDERING ACTIVITY DRAGS ON, AS OWNERS ARE LOOKING FOR LOWER PRICES - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Ship owners appear to be waiting for lower prices in their dealings with Asian shipyards, as the dry bulk market is at historical lows. According t ...
Wednesday, 11 February 15
DRY BULK MARKET REMAINED UNDER PRESSURE : STABILIZING CAPE MARKET HARDLY HELPED SENTIMENT
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market remained under pressure last week, while the stabilizing Cape market hardly helped sentiment.
Greece based s ...
Wednesday, 11 February 15
BDI HITTING THE ALL-TIME LOW; FFA MARKETS NOT SHOWING ANY POSITIVE SIGNS
With the BDI hitting the all-time low and with FFA markets not showing any positive signs for a possible recovery in the near future, pessimism is ...
Tuesday, 10 February 15
IRON ORE MARKET TO REMAIN OVERSUPPLIED IN 2015: PRICE FORECAST $70/T - WOOD MACKENZIE
COALspot.com: With January witnessing the price of iron ore falling to its lowest levels since May 2009, Roger Emslie, Principal Metals & ...
|
|
|
Showing 3201 to 3205 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Planning Commission, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- White Energy Company Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
|
| |
| |
|
