We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 10 March 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAPS HEADING SOUTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery declined US$ 0.24 per MT (-0.47%) month over month and US$ 1.52 (-2.93%) we ...
Tuesday, 10 March 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA POWER-STATION COAL SWAPS DECLINE
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q2’ 2015 delivery fell US$ 0.42 (-0.74%) per MT month over month and declined US$ 1.00 &nbs ...
Monday, 09 March 15
INDONESIA GREETS INDIA RATE CUT AS GOOD FOR EXPORTS - GLOBEASIA
Indonesian commodity producers and economists have hailed the Indian central bank’s rate cut as good for boosting exports from Southeast Asia ...
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S SUPREME COURT ISSUES NEW JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION ON SHIP ARREST AND JUDICIAL SALE OF SHIPS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
China is not traditionally a popular jurisdiction for ship arrest. However, Members and clients with ships calling at por ...
Monday, 09 March 15
CHINA'S IMPORTS - NEVER MORE IMPORTANT TO SHIPPING? - CLARKSONS
Over the last 15 years China has led maritime forecasters a right old dance. In 2002, rumours that Chinese iron ore imports were about to take off ...
|
|
|
Showing 3151 to 3155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- The University of Queensland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
