We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 11 March 15
DRY BULK MARKET CLOSED OFF ON THE GREEN FOR A SECOND WEEK IN A ROW - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off on the green for a second week in a row, while the performance of Capesizes hindered a more substantia ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
MARKET INSIGHT : NEWBUILDINGS - PANOS TSILINGIRIS
From a cost-based, buy-low perspective, there is currently a buying opportunity in the second-hand dry bulk market. I am an anti-cyclical (buy-low) ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
DRY BULK MARKET: ALL IS NOT LOST FOR A RECOVERY - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The low cost of commodities across the board could trigger an increase of trade among many countries, which in turn could lead to a recovery of the ...
Wednesday, 11 March 15
U.S. ELECTRIC GENERATING COMPANIES TO ADD MORE THAN 20 GW OF GENERATING CAPACITY IN 2015; 16 GW OF GENERATING CAPACITY IS EXPECTED TO RETIRE IN 2015
COALspot.com: In 2015, electric generating companies in U.S. expect to add more than 20 gigawatts (GW) of utility-scale generating capacity to the ...
Tuesday, 10 March 15
OIL PRICE FORECASTING - IGNORE THE EXPERTS: COLIN MARSHALL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Experts put themselves on a pedestal, making claims to have special forecasting abilities for oil price trends. They, too ...
|
|
|
Showing 3146 to 3150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Planning Commission, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Minerals Council of Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
