We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 19 June 15
U.S. WEEKLY COAL PRODUCTION UP SLIGHTLY COMPARED TO LAST WEEK; CONTINUES TO BE DOWN FROM LAST YEAR
COALspot.com – United States the second largest coal producer in the world has produced approximately totaled an estimated 15.4 million short ...
Friday, 19 June 15
INDONESIA'S COAL-TRAFFICKING PROBLEM REQUIRES IMPARTIAL INQUIRY - JAKARTA GLOBE
Indonesia, the leading supplier to the seaborne thermal coal market, produces 420 million tons of coal per year, according to its official tally.
...
Thursday, 18 June 15
DRY BULK SHIPPING: LOWEST FLEET GROWTH IN 10 YEARS MAY NOT PROVE ENOUGH AS DEMAND IS NOT KEEPING PACE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING NEWS
The demand side of things in the dry bulk market seems unable to keep pace with even the slightest fleet growth, a sign of the demise that the indu ...
Thursday, 18 June 15
THE FAR EAST HANDYSIZE, HANDYMAX, SUPRAMAX MARKET REMAINED STEADY LAST WEEK - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: The Dry Bulk market closed off on Friday (last week) noting small gains on the back of stronger performance in the Panamax segment, w ...
Thursday, 18 June 15
MERCATOR'S KAMSARMAX FIXED WITH CLEARLAKE
COALspot.com: Mercator Lines (Singapore) Limited, a leading Indian-owned international dry bulk shipping company focused on markets such as India, ...
|
|
|
Showing 2966 to 2970 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
