We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 23 June 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAP HAS REMAINED STEADY OVER THE PAST WEEK
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 rose month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was up US$ 2.32 ...
Monday, 22 June 15
BORYEONG POWER PLANT TO IMPORT 140K MT OF LCV COAL FOR AUGUST - SEPTEMBER 2015
COALspot.com: South Korean state-owned utility Korea Midland Power (KOMIPO) issued an new tender to purchase 140K Metric Tons (MT) of LCV coal for ...
Monday, 22 June 15
CFR SOUTH CHINA COAL SWAP: UP MONTH OVER MONTH; DOWN WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API 8 CFR South China Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery rose US$ 0.30 (0.58%) per MT month over month.
A commodity swap is a ...
Monday, 22 June 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP: UP WEEK OVER WEEK AND MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery up $ 0.54 per MT (1.19%) month over month to US$ 45.87 per mt. The swap was ...
Sunday, 21 June 15
SPOT RATE AVERAGES FOR FREIGHT FROM INDONESIA TO INDIA REMAIN STRONG THIS WEEK
COALspot.com: The freight market was quite firm this week compared to last week. The BDI was up 21% week on week and closed at 779 points. The cape ...
|
|
|
Showing 2961 to 2965 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- The University of Queensland
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Australian Coal Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
