We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 July 15
LACK OF FRESH BUSINESS IN THE PACIFIC LEFT CAPESIZE RATES MOVING SIDEWAYS - INTERMODAL
COALspot.com: Intermodal ship broker says in its weekly report that, a different picture from what we saw the previous week was painted during the ...
Wednesday, 08 July 15
RIO TINTO'S MODERNISED KITIMAT SMELTER BEGINS PRODUCTION; KITIMAT BECOMING ONE OF THE LOWEST COST SMELTERS IN THE WORLD
COALspot.com: Rio Tinto is preparing its first shipments of metal from its world-class Kitimat aluminium smelter in Canada following an extensive m ...
Wednesday, 08 July 15
Q3'15 INDONESIA COAL SWAP DECLINED 3.14% MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: Indonesian coal swap for delivery Q3 2015 declined month on month and week over week, this past week.
The Q3 swap was declined $ ...
Tuesday, 07 July 15
FOB RICHARDS BAY COAL SWAPS DECLINED WEEK OVER WEEK
COALspot.com: API4 FOB Richards Bay Coal swap for delivery Q3' 2015 declined month over month and week over week.
The Q3 swap was down US$ ...
Tuesday, 07 July 15
FOB NEWCASTLE COAL SWAP ADVANCED MONTH OVER MONTH
COALspot.com: API 5 FOB Newcastle Coal swap for Q3’ 2015 delivery up $ 0.28 per MT (-0.61%) month over month to US$ 45.85 per mt. The swap wa ...
|
|
|
Showing 2936 to 2940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Planning Commission, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Minerals Council of Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
